Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Michael James v. Daniel Cotter
as 16-6110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL COTTER, Perry CI Contraband Sgt, D. BURCINSKI, Contraband Cpl and S. DUFFY, Administrative Captain, Perry CI
Robinson v. Kirkland CIs Mailroom et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
Anthony Quentin Robinson
Defendant:
Kirkland CIs Mailroom and Kirkland Correctional Institution Property Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. PIEDMONT CI et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
PIEDMONT CI, TABOR CI, PENDER CI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Stewart et al
as 3:2015cv05943
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Belinda Stewart, Bernard Warner, Earl Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Brown v. Okeechobee CI Warden, et al
as 15-15489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
OKEECHOBEE CI WARDEN and SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
VAN DYKE v. WILKINSON et al
as 1:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
WILKINSON, AGEE, HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karen Wilkins v. S. Razdan, et al
as 15-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN L. WILKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. RAZDAN, MD- Homestead CI, ROQUE, CEASER, Homestead CI and others
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
VAN DYKE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
KENT BROWN, FRANK WITNEY, ROBERT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Young v. Gerald Theilen
as 15-13158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD O. THEILEN, Mail Collection Representative, Sumter CI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
