Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Walker v. USA
as 3:2008cv01314
Plaintiff:
Demario D Walker
Defendant:
USA, Attorney General of the State of California and Governor State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01609
Plaintiff:
Lacedric W Johnson
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, J. Tilton, A Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. State of Idaho et al
as 2:2008cv00445
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Governor, State of Idaho, Attorney for Governor, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Khoshdel, et al
as 08-20130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY JACKSON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
ABBAS KHOSHDEL, MD, BOBBY VINCENT, MD, KIMBERLY FORSTI and others
Whitfield v. Adamson et al
as 3:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
BenYehudah Whitfield
Defendant:
C/O Adamson, Neil C. Bantican, R Baylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv02717
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Walker
Defendant:
Authur Smith, S. L. Schultz, G. Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Netterville
as 2:2007cv03578
Plaintiff:
Julius D Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Alden B. Netterville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria et al v. Napoli et al
as 1:2007cv00430
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Victoria, Holy Tabernacle Ministries and Jeremiah Stroman
Defendant:
D. F. Napoli, Paul Chappius, Jr., Stanley T. Chaplain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackridge v. Walker et al
as 1:2007cv05488
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Ackridge
Defendant:
Samuel D. Walker, Frances A. Nicolai, Ann T. Pfau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. McCullum
as 2:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Demario D. Walker
Defendant:
Henry A. McCullum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
