Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Rice v. Doe, et al
as 08-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SKYLER THOMAS RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE, JOHN #2 DOE and JOHN #3 DOE
Shanklin v. Fernald, et al
as 08-50342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent IRS-CID, MCKINNIES, AGENT NFN MCKINNIES, Special Agent in Charge IRS-CID, HARLAN CARTER, Special Agent in Charge and others
Page v. Doe, et al.
as 3:2008cv05215
Plaintiff:
Alexander Page
Defendant:
John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
Daven Demetrius Brown
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John #2 Doe, John #3 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Masse v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Toby J Masse
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Beccerra, Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Masse v. Waddington et al
as 3:2007cv05715
Plaintiff:
Toby J. Masse
Defendant:
Doug Waddington, Jacobs, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Doe et al
as 5:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Rogers
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Doe et al
as 7:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Rogers
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fontenot v. Czerniak et al
as 6:2007cv00778
Petitioner:
Deryl James Fontenot
Respondent:
Stan Czerniak, Steve Shelton, M.D., Dr. Degner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Devine et al
as 1:2006cv06954
Plaintiff:
Otha B Anderson
Defendant:
Richard Devine, Phil Cline, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
