Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Jimmie Stephen v. Hoxie, et al
as 08-56247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMIE STEPHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HOXIE, Doctor, MARSHAL, Warden, D. C. CASTILLO and others
Lamon v. Director of the CDC et al
as 2:2008cv01762
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
Director of the CDC, G Stratton, S. Kerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. Epps, et al
as 08-60658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLOMON S KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent, JAMES BREWER, Area Warden and others
Miranda v. Giurbino et al
as 3:2008cv00550
Plaintiff:
William C Miranda
Defendant:
G.J. Giurbino, S Valenzuela, S Swift and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HINES v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2008cv00740
Plaintiff:
DONALD HINES
Defendant:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, D. C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN CAUFIELD
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stephen v. Hoxie et al
as 3:2008cv00790
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
Hoxie, Marshal, D C Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DELOACH v. D. C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2007cv01691
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. DELOACH
Defendant:
D. C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOURSCHER v. CASSTEVENS et al
as 1:2007cv00663
Plaintiff:
MARK TOURSCHER
Defendant:
LEON CASSTEVENS, KIM CLARK PHILLIPS, ALLEN SNEED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Chavez v. Tyson et al
as 5:2007cv00809
Plaintiff:
Michael Chavez
Defendant:
Tyson, W V D C, County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dancy v. George et al
as 7:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Khasan A. Dancy
Defendant:
Joseph George, Ella Stevens, USP Big Sandy Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
