Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Andre Martinez v. USA
as 16-1291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martinez v. Doe et al
as 3:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Andre Martinez
Defendant:
John Doe and Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2013cv01475
Plaintiff:
Andre Martinez
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP - Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rios-Vargas v. Administracion de Correccion et al
as 3:2013cv01387
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion, FNU Rivera, Jorge Silvestrini and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Rios-Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. The United States Postal Services
as 9:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
The United States Postal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. The United States Postal Services
as 6:2013cv06108
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
The United States Postal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. New York State Department of C
as 11-4245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correctional Services, Jane Doe, Dietitian, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, John Doe, Sgt. South Side, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Lape, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Joan Smith, Deputy Sup. of Health, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Mr. Killar, I.G.R.C. Supervisor, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Martinez v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
as 9:2009cv00665
Plaintiff:
Andre Martinez
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
