Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Byers v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Jodie Louis Byers
Defendant:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Phil Sorrels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huber-Byers, Steven v. Verse, Jim et al
as 3:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Huber-Byers
Defendant:
Captain Jim Verse, Mike Kiefer, Sergeant Mitch Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Sheriff Dept Employees et al
as 7:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
Sheriff Dept Employees, FNU Williams, FNU Holliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Bradford v. G. Church, et al
as 23-15293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
G. CHURCH, CARSON, B. BYRANT and others
Aaron v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Kameon V Aaron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Marshall Reed, Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Paschall v. Frank Gable, et al
as 22-3300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher L. Paschall
Defendant / Appellee:
Chief of Police Frank Gable, Springdale Police Department, City of Springdale, Arkansas, John Doe, Custodian of the Records and others
Lafonzo Turner v. S. Byer
as 22-16573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BYER, Sgt. Individual Capacity
Lafonzo Turner v. S. Byer
as 22-16553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BYER, Sgt. Individual Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
