Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wallace Mitchell v. Joan Davage, et al
as 22-5171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wallace Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
Joan Davage, Mental Health Technician, Nicole Colbert, Chaplain, Kathleen Jo Landerkin, Deputy Warden, also known as Ewok and others
White v. Cortez et al
as 1:2019cv01131
Plaintiff:
Randy Charles White
Defendant:
Johnny Alexander, Nurse Amanda LNU and FNU Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kyle Smith, Joe Riley, Greg Robinson and others
Defendant:
CLU Screening, Ken Faulk, Reggie Nevels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2014fp00538
Defendant:
FCI Berlin
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Unknown Defendant Prison Staff
as 3:2012cv00900
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant Prison Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Ryker et al
as 3:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Defendant:
Warden Ryker, Warden Hodge, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bricker v. Jerry Everheart, et al
as 11-1387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY EVERHEART, Unit Manager, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, Superintendent/Grievance Coordinator, CHARLES WHITE, Counsel and others
Bricker v. Everheart et al
as 1:2010cv02516
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Jerry Everheart, Doretta Chencharick, Charles White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 4:2010cv02164
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Warden Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Shartle et al
as 4:2010cv02159
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Defendant:
Warden Shartle, Federal Correction Institution Elkton, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
