Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Thomas v. Fisher et al
as 5:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Frank Thomas
Defendant:
Ross Fisher, Mark Knutson, Cheri Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU ROGERS, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Ezell v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Lain
as 23-267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent S. Long
Defendant / Appellee:
Major Matthew Whitmore, Captain Christopher Hand, Sheriff Joel Ordway, (reitred) and others
Cole v. Bryant et al
as 3:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Escavili and Bryant
Plaintiff:
David Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohamed Omran v. USA, et al
as 18-30420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED ADMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER HARTNET, DAVID COLE and others
Omran v. USA et al
as 5:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Admed Hassan Abdallah Omran
Defendant:
USA, Hartnet, David Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole v. Washburn et al
as 3:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
David Cole
Defendant:
f/n/u Washburn, Johana Veal, f/n/u Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Lain et al
as 6:2016cv06531
Plaintiff:
Vincent S. Long
Defendant:
Christopher Lain, Matthew Whitmore, Christopher Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
