Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Santos et al v. Parmitel et al
as 9:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos, Windsor Coleman, Miguel Melendez and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmitel, Chaz Andrews, W. N. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. BRANNON et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
OFFICER K. B. STEWART, MAGISTRATE H. D. BRANNON, RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
QUANTEZ THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behl v. Peters et al
as 8:2019cv02608
Defendant:
R. Timothy Peters, Robert J. Krauss, E. C. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Behl, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockenauer v. E. C. Brooks Correction Fac. et al
as 4:2018cv12140
Defendant:
Warden, John and Jane Does, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Stockenauer
Campbell v. Sage et al
as 5:2018cv03096
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Campbell
Defendant:
R. S. Sage, B. A. Relp, E. C. McCluskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behl v. Peters et al
as 8:2017cv01749
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Behl, Sr.
Defendant:
R. Timothy Peters, Christina T. Helinger, Darryl C. Casanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustavo Alvarez v. State of California, et al
as 17-15062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
John Donohue v. J. Lambert
as 16-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK DONOHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. LAMBERT, LT. MCCOWAN, LT. LIEUTENANT PAYNE and others
Defendant:
LT. SERGEANT BLEVENS, WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA, C/O OFFICER BEVERLY and others
Garcia v. Conner et al
as 1:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Esteban Garcia, Sr.
Defendant:
Jack Conner, B. Ruff, E. C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARCIA v. CONNER et al
as 1:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
ESTEBAN GARCIA, SR.
Defendant:
JACK CONNER, B. RUFF, E. C. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
