Cases 1 - 10 of 400
Lee v. Stanton et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Gilford Lee
Defendant:
D. Stanton, Warden Larry T. Edmonds and Reg. Administrator Adrian Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Edmond et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Edmond, Bowers and Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Edmond Paul Price
Defendant:
Netanjah Breitenbach, Ball, Wilcoxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edmond, Lucson v. Pena
as 1:2024cv20769
Plaintiff:
Lucson Edmond
Defendant:
Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Edmonds et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Edmonds, U.S. Attorney Williams, Det. Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
