Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Velasquez v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Miguel Tapia Velasquez
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Rex Tillerson, et al
as 22-35626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
REX W. TILLERSON, CEO of Exxon Mobil Corporation, TIM COOK, CEO of Apple, Inc. and WARREN E. BUFFETT, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
John Demos, Jr. v. Rex Tillerson, et al
as 22-35519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
REX W. TILLERSON, CEO, Exxon Mobil corporation, TIM COOK, CEO, Apple Inc. and WARREN E. BUFFETT, CEO, Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Demos et al v. Marathon Oil Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00777
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Society of TRUTH
Defendant:
Marathon Oil Corporation, Phillips 66, Sunoco Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Rockford Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv50006
Plaintiff:
Percy F Baker
Defendant:
City of Rockford Police Department, Police Sgt., Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Exxon Valdez et al
as 3:2007cv05871
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Exxon Valdez, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Joseph Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
