Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Fry v. Rash et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
State Trooper Cpl. Gregory Rash, D.A.G Isaac Rank, D.A.G. James Betts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
Judge Megan Adams, A.G. James Betts, John Edinger, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primus v. Fry
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Carron Lee Primus
Defendant:
Mr Fry and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otte v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Mike Fusselman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Stammitti et al.
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fry
Defendant:
Phil R. Stammitti, Corrections Officer Brian Tellier, Sergeant Jennifer Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Otte v. Fussleman et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Mike Fussleman, Jessica Tagg, Aleix Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
