Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FITZPATRICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. FITZPATRICK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mays v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jesse Mays
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Det. Pokuta, J.D. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafael Ferguson v. S. Guerrero, et al
as 18-55309
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAFAEL FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. GUERRERO, D. TURNER, J. DIAZ and others
Williams v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Randy Laquawn Williams
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Stephen J. Dougherty, William J. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Turner et al
as 1:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ferguson
Defendant:
S Guerrero, D Turner, J. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Villa et al
as 3:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ferguson
Defendant:
M. Villa, G. Trujillo, H. Groth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Onondaga County et al
as 9:2011cv00324
Plaintiff:
Terrence T Stewart
Defendant:
William J Fitzpatrick, M. Ann Ciarpelli and Onondaga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Onondoga County et al
as 1:2011cv01187
Defendant:
M. Ann Ciarpelli, William J Fitzpatrick and Onondoga County
Plaintiff:
Terrence T Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
