Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Simpson v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Preston Wade Simpson
Defendant:
Joel J. Schwartz and Brianne Rose Besheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01038
Defendant:
S.O.S. Officer Jane Doe, S.O.S. Officer Rollison, A.W. Eckhart and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Mayer et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Preston W. Simpson
Defendant:
Joel J. Schwartz, Robert Haas, Randy Elles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell v. Loesch et al
as 2:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
Denard Antwaun Rowell
Defendant:
Jeremy Loesch, N&S Towing Inc, Dodge County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
Joel J Schwartz and RSRG Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Peyton v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-55140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EUGENE PEYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., JEFFREY BEARD, BERNARD J. SCHWARTZ and others
Raymond Peyton v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-56405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EUGENE PEYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., individual and official capacity, JEFFREY BEARD, individual and official capacity and BERNARD J. SCHWARTZ, Superior Court Judge individual and official capacity
Raymond E Peyton v. Edmund G Brown Jr et al
as 5:2013cv00424
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Jeffrey Beard, Edmund G Brown, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Peyton
Thomasson v. Koehn et al
as 3:2011cv02392
Plaintiff:
Thomas Guy Thomasson
Defendant:
J. Koehn, A Farley, W. Sevison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz v. Socorro County Detention Center
as 2:2007cv01106
Plaintiff:
Leo J. Schwartz, III
Defendant:
Socorro County Detention Center, Jatejkka Ray Olguin, Margaret Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
