Civil Rights Cases
Jackson v. Goodwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05959
Plaintiff: Jackson Jerell and Jerell Marshon Jackson
Defendant: Todd E Goodwin, Sgt Brian Schuetter, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Quay et al
as 1:2021cv02130
Defendant: Jane Joe, Warden Herman Quay, MS/NP Brian Gerson and others
Plaintiff: Eddie Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizarro v. Board of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv05720
Plaintiff: Jose Pizarro
Defendant: Board of Correction, N.Y.C. Health and Hospital, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McClure v. Brad Livingston, Executive Dir, et al
as 16-50202
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT TROY MCCLURE
Defendant - Appellee: BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, SHARON KELLER, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals, LAWRENCE E. MYERS, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals and others
McClure v. Livingston et al
as 1:2016cv00089
Defendant: Elsa Alcala, Jane/ Joe Doe, Barbara Hervey and others
Plaintiff: Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Gregory v. Brooklyn North Narcotics et al
as 1:2013cv03727
Defendant: Brooklyn North Narcotics, Jane Joe, Jhon Joe and others
Plaintiff: Paul Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Brooklyn North Narcotics et al
as 1:2013cv04286
Plaintiff: Paul Gregory
Defendant: Brooklyn North Narcotics, Jhon Joe, Jane Joe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Holder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv01544
Plaintiff: Nathan E. Jacobs
Defendant: Eric Holder, J.T. Shartle, Jane/Joe Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?