Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Black v. Griffin et al
as 3:2018cv00686
Defendant:
Unknown Shaver, Unknown Cater, Sander Ardoin and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Joe Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooden #157185 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2015cv02337
Plaintiff:
Trevis Dewayne Wooden
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated, George Zoley, Patricia Persante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Davis v. Betty Marak, et al
as 13-30968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTY MARAK, JOE BLACK and UNKNOWN FED AGENTS
Davis v. Marrak et al
as 5:2013cv02182
Plaintiff:
Brian Davis
Defendant:
Betty Marrak, Joe Black, Unknown Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harold Black v. Concordia Parish Rehab Center, et al
as 12-30688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
CONCORDIA PARISH REHAB CENTER & FACILITY II, RUSSELL BUTLER, RANDY MAXWELL and others
Harold Black v. Don Hathaway, et al
as 12-30482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DON HATHAWAY, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Caddo Parish, CADDO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and PARISH OF CADDO
Black v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv01053
Plaintiff:
Harold Joe Black
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Don Hathaway, Allan Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Black v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 09-31229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, TIMOTHY WILKINSON, KEITH DEVILLE and others
Black v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2009cv01024
Plaintiff:
Harold Joe Black
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Timothy Wilkinson, Keith Deville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bledsoe v. Marshall City Police Department
as 2:2008cv00241
Plaintiff:
James Lee Bledsoe
Defendant:
Marshall City Police Department, David Reaves, Clint Guttirrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
