Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Soliz v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Sheriff John Hooper, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tremonti Perry v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 23-1455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tremonti Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Ian Wallace, Warden, Southeast Missouri Correctional Center, Corizon LLC and others
Keeling v. Garnett Hospitality et al
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keeling
Defendant:
Garnett Hospitality, Commonwealth Hotels, Allianz Global and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Sackler Family
as 1:2022cv05918
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant:
Sackler Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Sala
as 8:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant:
Eva Sala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Clements et al
as 5:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
M.D. John Matthew Gayden, Jr. and John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen Clements and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bandy v. Carthage Police Department et al
as 6:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Carthage Police Department, Panola County Jail and Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Bandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bandy v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board
as 6:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Bandy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Hopkins County Jail
as 3:2020cv00820
Respondent:
Hopkins County Jail
Petitioner:
John Matthew Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
