Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aigbekaen v. Warden
as 23-388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond I. Aigbekaen
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, FCI Danbury, McGregor, Lt., S.I.S, Gillepsie, Lt. and others
Emily Hari v. James Stuart, et al
as 22-1742
Plaintiff:
Malik Laughlin and Kenneth Lewis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Emily Claire Hari, formerly known as Michael Hari
Defendant / Appellee:
James Stuart, Sheriff of Anoka County, Jonathon Evans, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County, Lt. S. Larson, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County and others
Fourstar v. Rielly et al
as 1:2021cv02925
Plaintiff:
Victor C. Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Rielly, Mary Fritsimmons, David Quintez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17792
Plaintiff:
WAYNE KENNETH LEWIS and KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. R. J. Donovan
as 3:2021cv01267
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
R. J. Donovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv20490
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
James Carlyle Williams, Jr., David M. Pascoe, Jr., Diane Shafer Goodstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. State of California et al
as 2:2016cv01576
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis Faulkner
Defendant:
State of California, Mule Creek State Prison and B. Kissel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. State of California et al
as 1:2016cv00980
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis Faulkner
Defendant:
State of California, Mule Creek State Prison and B. Kissel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Reese Lane and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
