Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mark Bowers v. David Mullen, et al
as 16-3926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Bowers
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Mullen, MD, ERDCC, John Williams, MD, MECC, Karl Hardman, RN BN Health Service Administrator and others
Ulysses Perez v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 16-40347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULYSSES A. PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARREN S. MAYER, Sergeant TDCJ-CID, TEMPLE RAMMING, State Counsel for Offenders, State of Texas and others
Perez v. Stephens et al
as 2:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Ulysses A Perez
Defendant:
William Stephens, Darren S Mayer, Temple Ramming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Mullen et al
as 4:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Mark Bowers
Defendant:
David A. Mullen, John Williams, Corizon Mo Regional Office, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00346
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White, Faygie Fields, Terrence M Love and others
Defendant:
Yolande D Johnson, Gregory Lambert, Robin Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. State of Texas, TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Florencio Hernandez
Defendant:
State of Texas, TDCJ-CID, Alton Alexander, Joe Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. State of Ga. et al
as 5:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Allen Ellis
Defendant:
State of Ga., Mark Bowers, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Merchant et al
as 3:2007cv00341
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Pickett
Defendant:
Jay Merchant, Jacob Null, Jason Garnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Merchant et al
as 1:2007cv01041
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Pickett
Defendant:
Jay Merchant, Jacob Null, Jason Garnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
