Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Peyton v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jacob Douglas Peyton
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKeithen v. Ms. Jones Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Aqui McKeithen
Defendant:
Ms. Jones Correctional Officer, Ms. Fletcher Unit Manager, Nevada Southern Detention Center Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conseillant v. Physician et al
as 1:2023cv06386
Plaintiff:
Frantz Conseillant and UR-Amen
Defendant:
Physician, Ms. Jones and Head of G.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE v. FIELDER et al
as 5:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CLARENCE POOLE
Defendant:
MS FIELDER and MS JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al
as 5:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Quantovia Robinson
Defendant:
Mr. Odum, Ms. Jones, Mr. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
BARNOCKY v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BARNOCKY, JR.
Defendant:
MR. LEE, MS. JONES, MS. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blowe v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ronald Blowe
Defendant:
Miller, Taylor, Ms. Jones Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
