Cases 1 - 10 of 80
McCartney v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv61161
Plaintiff:
Lacody McCartney
Defendant:
Sergeant P. Williams, Deputy C. Anda, Deputy Fawaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Brightwell v. Kasahun et al
as 1:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Defendant:
M.D. Temesgen Kasahun, Robert P. Williams, M.D. and NP LUM Maximuangu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark-El v. Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Lisa et al
as 1:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark-El
Defendant:
Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Lisa, Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Christina, Dr. Salin Nhean Nhean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BASKIN v. LEAVINS
as 3:2021cv00699
Defendant:
AARON LEAVINS, B PINEDAS, M BANTIQUE and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkins v. Corizon Resident Agent
as 1:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
William Burkins
Defendant:
Corizon Resident Agent, Jane Doe Scheduler, NP Clarice Aryiku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moore v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv02777
Defendant:
A. Smith, K. Striblin, D. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Moore
Petitioner:
Mark A Munoz, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mills v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Shaka Senghor, J. Manangan, R. Juarez and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hammler v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv00488
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Parks, Ralph Diaz, P. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gollnick v. State of Michigan et al
as 1:2020cv10645
Defendant:
Joe Williams, Michelle A. Bianchi, Aline Nass and others
Plaintiff:
Steven John Gollnick
Robinson v. Hadnot et al
as 1:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
C Hadnot, FNU Hawkin, L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
