Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scarborough v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Desmond Deondre Scarborough
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center I, Guard Phibbs, Guard Fullers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Crimmett et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Crimmett, C.O. & Goose Creek Correctional Center Official's, McCormeik and others
Rose v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
as 2:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barbati v. Flowers
as 6:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Barbati
Defendant:
Mark Flowers
Consolidated Defendant:
Micah Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbati v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Barbati
Defendant:
Micah Scarborough and Mark Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Scarborough
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mark Allen
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Scarborough
as 3:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Tyler Joseph Petty
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Scarborough
as 3:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Erik T. Anderson
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael King
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough, John (last name unknown) and Larry Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
