Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Daryl Burford v. Chris Brun, et al
as 22-5508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL K. BURFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS BRUN, CAPTAIN WILLIAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT DAVIS, SERGEANT WRIGHT and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ALLEN
Pew v. Osceola County Jail et al
as 6:2021cv00644
Defendant:
R. Williams, Chief Holt, C. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Artis v. K. Mentally
as 18-6527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON ARTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. THOMAS MENTALLY, WARDEN BEALE, WARDEN PEAGEN and others
Michael Gonzales v. Ferrso et al
as 2:2016cv07604
Defendant:
Brosman, Sergeant Davis, Escalante and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Everick Monk v. Former Sheriff Foster, et al
as 13-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Everick Lovosier Monk
Defendant - Appellee:
Former Sheriff Foster, Former Captain Truman Young, Lieutenant Janet Delaney and others
Moody v. Clark et al
as 4:2012cv03358
Plaintiff:
Steven Moody
Defendant:
Sergeant Clark, Sergeant Davis, Sergeant Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2012cv03949
Defendant:
Sergeant Davis, Sheriff Vincent F. DeMarco, Correctional Officer Forie and others
Plaintiff:
Charles McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Wray, Jr. v. R. Mitchell
as 12-7231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DAVID MITCHELL, BEVERLY PERDUE, ROY COOPER and others
Montanez v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv08020
Plaintiff:
Javier Montanez
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer Anderson, Officer Smulski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Edmond v. Wallace, et al
as 11-10904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE EDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
WALLACE, Warden, PITTMAN, Captain, DAVIS, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
