Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Coleman v. Bowker et al
as 0:2023cv01849
Plaintiff:
Mr. William Coleman, Mr. William Theoplas Coleman, Mr. William T. Coleman and others
Defendant:
Officer Bowker, Officer Maldanado and Rock Hill Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
OConnor v. Norman et al
as 3:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Casey OConnor, James Casey O, OConnor and others
Defendant:
Brad Norman, Charles Edge and William Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felts v. King
as 1:2019cv24978
Plaintiff:
William Coleman Felts
Defendant:
W. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felts v. Officer R Jones
as 1:2019cv20901
Plaintiff:
William Coleman Felts
Defendant:
Officer R Jones and Officer Roger Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. GEO et al
as 2:2017cv01595
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Moses
Defendant:
GEO, Allen Correctional Center, David J Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00540
Plaintiff:
William Coleman
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. CITY OF LONG BRANCH et al
as 3:2015cv07314
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF LONG BRANCH, ADAMS SCHNEIDER, JASON ROEBUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. SNOWDEN et al
as 3:2015cv04270
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE H. SNOWDEN, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and LONG BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 3:2015cv03539
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
ADAMS SCHNEIDER, JASON ROEBUCK, NICHOLAS ROMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Donawa v. FCC Coleman - USP II Warden, et al
as 12-14730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DONAWA
Defendant - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP II WARDEN, RAYMOND HOLT, Regional Director - FBOP, THOMAS R. KANE, BOP Dirctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
