Cases 91 - 100 of 192,304
Jones v. Jail Detective of F-R-J
as 8:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Jail Detective of F-R-J
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime v. New York State et al
as 1:2024cv03819
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Defendant:
New York State, Department of Correction Community Supervision and Officer Reddish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime v. Doe
as 1:2024cv03824
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karlester Young v. Kip Hallman, et al
as 24-1920
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, President of Wellpath Holdings, PAUL NOEL, Chief Medical Director, ANTHONY LITIZIO and others
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Torres v. BOP
as 3:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Antolin Abonza Torres
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pitts
Defendant:
Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalski v. Purillo et al
as 1:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cortez Michalski
Defendant:
Purillo, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gambaiani v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Grant Gambaiani
Defendant:
Brittany Green, Latoya Hughes, Kindell Kestner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
