Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Patterson v. Cooley et al
as 2:2017cv07564
Plaintiff:
Lionel Patterson
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Donna Johnson, Darrell Vannoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain et al v. Pinckneyville Segregation et al
as 2:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
China Anne McClain, Johnnie Garrett and Sienna McClain
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Segregation, Personal Property, Offender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICE v. BEVARIDGE et al
as 2:2015cv05266
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
BEVARIDGE and CHINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blast v. Griffin et al
as 1:2015cv01558
Plaintiff:
Synthia-China Blast
Defendant:
Patrick J. Griffin, Jason D. Effman, Deputy Inspector General of the Sex Crimes Unit for ("DOCCS") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine China v. Lt. Marskberry
as 14-7674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE J. CHINA
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. MARSKBERRY, MAJOR NETTLES, FRED B. THOMPSON, Warden and others
Garrett v. McClain
as 6:2013cv01862
Defendant:
China Anne McClain
Plaintiff:
Johnny Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain, Garrett v Attorney General, State of Illinois, et al.
as 3:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
China Anne McClain and Johnnie Garrett
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois, People of the State of Illinois and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
China v. Marskberry et al
as 5:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Antoine J China
Defendant:
Lt Marskberry, Major Nettles, Fred B Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kelly v. China et al
as 1:2010cv06136
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Kelly
Defendant:
A.V. China, Abraham, (Polite) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Mr. China A on V et al
as 1:2010cv05361
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Kelly
Defendant:
Mr. China A on V, Mr. Polite Correction Officer at O.B.C.C., Mr. Williams Correction Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
