Cases 11 - 20 of 56
LEE v. MCCRAINE
as 3:2020cv05462
Defendant:
T MCCRAINE, C CATTNACH, D DICE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. HUNTER et al
as 4:2019cv00438
Defendant:
T SMITH, JEAN 3 DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEATON v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00025
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, TARLOS THOMAS, TIMOTHY R NOLES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES KEATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. DENNY et al
as 1:2017cv04663
Defendant:
COFFEE, JANE 1 DOE, JOHN 2 DOE and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DENNY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06439
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, M Abernathy, D Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayorga v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv08044
Plaintiff:
Antonio Mayorga
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv06307
Plaintiff:
Naphtali Miller
Defendant:
John #1 Doe and John #2 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 15-1287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Gary Randolph v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary Randolph
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Director MO DOC, Douglas Prudden, Superintendent, John I Doe, Major and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
