Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Blackmon v. Hamilton
as 3:2019cv00843
Defendant:
Police Officer Cody Hamilton and Coty Hamilton
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Carlos Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Sergeant Moore, Sergeant Dees, Warden Lightner and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Houston County et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv01001
Defendant:
J. Trawick, Houston County Commissioners, Judge Derrick and others
Plaintiff:
Allerie T. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. G4S Secure Solutions American Group et al
as 8:2019cv01990
Plaintiff:
Herschel M. Blackmon, Sr.
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions American Group, Chris Nocco and J. McGuffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. BLACKMON et al
as 5:2019cv00294
Defendant:
DOE #3, DOE #2, DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
TYRELL DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIXON v. LONG et al
as 5:2019cv00311
Plaintiff:
SAMMY A DIXON
Defendant:
MAJOR RICHARD GANDY, BLACKMON, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Circuit Court Judge Jamie Lewis Blackmon, State of Mississippi and D.A. Akita Malone
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Calvin Troy May, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Malone et al
as 5:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Otis Oliver McCray
Defendant:
Jessica S. Malone, Kelvin Colbert, Lillie Blackmon Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLINTON v. EARLY et al
as 5:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLINTON
Defendant:
LYNN EARLY, NIKKI GARDNER, MELANIE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilcotte Rahming, Alabama Department of Corrections and Kilby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
