Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Webster Williams, III v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Amicus Curiae:
ARC OF THE UNITED STATES, MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA and NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK
Melton v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Melton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, M. Carvajal, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Rankins v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Bureau of Prisons, J.C. PETRUCC, Regional Director, JOHN OR JANE DOE, Food Service Administrator and others
Crawford v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schexnayder v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ashdon Schexnayder
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03005
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Carvajal, James Devere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schexnayder et al v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ashdon Schexnayder and Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emery v. Sage et al
as 3:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Sonja Emery
Defendant:
Warden Jessica Sage, Michael Carvajal, Jessica Sage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guzman Lorea v. True et al
as 1:2021cv02794
Plaintiff:
Joaquin A. Guzman Lorea
Defendant:
B. True, B. (I) True, Holbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
