Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Lewis v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2019cv00079
Defendant:
S. Martin, Daniel Deleon, Lt. M. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen, Sr. v. McDaniel
as 6:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Officer McDaniel
Plaintiff:
Deantwan M. Allen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perconti v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv03566
Defendant:
Roling Sharp, George Adamson, Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Perconti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritz v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02895
Plaintiff:
Jason Anton Fritz
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, M Allen, Unknown Gibb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Olivarez v. Rodney Brown, et al
as 16-4028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Olivarez
Defendant - Appellee:
Rodney D. Brown, Correctional Property Sergeant, Marquis L. Lundy, Correctional Lieutenant, EARU, Darren Daniels, Correctional Sergeant and others
Houston v. Pfister et al
as 1:2016cv08861
Plaintiff:
Willie James Houston
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Sullivan and M Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Dunahue v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 16-2592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Grant Harris, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry May, former Deputy Director and others
Owens v. North et al
as 3:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens
Defendant:
T. North, L. Bennefield, Corrillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPINAL v. STEELE et al.
as 3:2015cv00328
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ESPINAL
Defendant:
J STEELE, M ALLEN, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS, JR
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, R COMERFORD, M BOOKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
