Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Hulley v. Northern Regional Jail
as 3:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Northern Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Damon William Hulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skeens v. Stanley
as 5:2019cv00628
Defendant:
Officer Stanley
Plaintiff:
William P Skeens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richendollar v. Hudgins
as 1:2019cv00147
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Petitioner:
William L. Richendollar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cruickshank v. Henson
as 3:2019cv00370
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen William Cruickshank
Defendant:
Aaron Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Carver, et al
as 1:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Hunt
Defendant:
FCI McDowell, Mr. Johnson, P.A. William Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharp v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2019cv00336
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
William C. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. WV Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 5:2019cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Williams
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Southern Regional Jail, WV Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. McCoy et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Officer McCoy, Southern Regional Jail and Officer James MaCoy
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Malone, William Skeens and Eugene Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00067
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Prime Care Medical Inc., Nurse Molly and others
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00068
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Zack, Prime Care Medical Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
