Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Micah Jefferson v. Stephen Kessler, et al
as 22-2811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICAH ASHER JEFFERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN KESSLER, Correctional Officer and DEE DEE BROOKHART
Dees v. Peters et al
as 5:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Defendant:
K. Peters, Morgan, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PRICE v. TOLBERT et al
as 2:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
BRICE PRICE
Defendant:
RUSSELL TOLBERT, ZATECKY, CRABB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Smith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Charles Gene Dees, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Smith and Officer Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zepeda v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Dee Dee Brookhart, Lori Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hamm et al
as 2:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
John Hamm and Cam Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Shah et al
as 3:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris, Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gomez et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Maurice S. Johnson
Defendant:
David Gomez, Graves, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
