Cases 31 - 40 of 10,533
FAGAN v. GOODE et al
as 2:2024cv05519
Defendant:
JAQUANA GOODE, JOHN DOE #4, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMELL FAGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. INCH et al
as 3:2024cv00500
Defendant:
CODY MITCHELL, S DOVE, MACCARGAR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00951
Respondent:
A. Grisheimer, John Doe, II and John Doe, I
Petitioner:
Jermaine Howard Wesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHRIVER v. BABCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
CHESTER MUNKSGARD, JOHN DOES 1-6, LT. HAGGERTY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SHRIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cardoso et al
as 3:2024cv01627
Defendant:
John Doe, Tracy C. Cardoso, Heather Jane McHugh and others
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KLEIMAN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00490
Defendant:
HEFLIN, PABLO PEREZ, MURRAY YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
MAXIMILIAN KLEIMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Scarpore et al
as 6:2024cv06583
Defendant:
John Doe, D.S.A. K. Pettine, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Saroka et al
as 3:2024cv02300
Defendant:
Bryce W. Hicks, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ezell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartfield v. Lozar et al
as 2:2024cv02232
Defendant:
John Doe, Troy Lozar, Robert Derouchie and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Hartfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOTEN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CENTURION HEALTH LLC. and BYRD
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.