Cases 41 - 50 of 4,023
Cameron v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cameron
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rollin Cook, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donyiell Brown v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
DONYIELL T. BROWN
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, THOMAS J. DART and others
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02445
Plaintiff:
Tirnell Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois, Cermak Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Reynolds v. Pamela Cook, et al
as 24-1618
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Reynolds
Defendant:
Pamela Cook, Lieutenant, DRU, ADC, F.D. Gilbert, Sergeant, DRU, ADC, D.J. Wilson, Corporal, DRU, ADC and others
Preston #235170 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Cook, Unknown Ryhdall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10701
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Cook, Ryhdall and others
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
Tirnell Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Illinois, Klimik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
