Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Thomas-El v. Spears et al
as 1:2012cv05348
Plaintiff:
Darnell Thomas-El
Defendant:
Spears and Humphries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANNERS v. HUMPHRIES
as 5:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEE HANNERS
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William v. Newhart et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome William
Defendant:
John R. Newhart, Ms. Christopher, Mr. Hercules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. HUMPHRIES
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS STONE
Defendant:
MARTHA HUMPHRIES, RODNEY TOMLINSON, BRANDY DEWEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Cantrell v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 11-2993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
PEREZ v. SIMPSON , et al
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
MELVIN PEREZ
Defendant:
MARTHA D HUMPHRIES, FREDDIE MOCK, MICHAEL G SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. Owens et al
as 5:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Defendant:
Brian Owens, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIVEY v. Jackson Georgia Diagnostic Classification et al
as 5:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Defendant:
JACKSON GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION, HUMPHRIES, POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIELS v. LIVINGSTON et al
as 1:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MCDANIELS
Defendant:
DEBRA LIVINGSTON, MARTHA HUMPHRIES, F WINBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIVEY v. HUMPHRIES et al
as 5:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Defendant:
Carl Humphries, MALONE, POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.