Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Ortega v. Ritchie et al
as 4:2018cv02944
Plaintiff:
Carlos Armando Ortega
Defendant:
Mark Ritchie, Amarjit Grewal, Beverly Purdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv02966
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moore
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois , Jorelle Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey Mattingly v. Duval County Jail, et al
as 18-11608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASEY MATTINGLY
Defendant - Appellee:
DUVAL COUNTY JAIL, SHANDS HOSPITAL, DEBRA BARNES, M.D. and others
Taylor v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01078
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pretty, Pam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Higdon v. Leon Malachinski, et al
as 17-17301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HIGDON, AKA David A. Higdon, AKA David Augustine Higdon
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON MALACHINSKI, MD, Resident Physician until 3/2016 at ASPC-Lewis Corizon, KYLE GEELAN, Dentist at ASPC-Lewis Corizon, TAMMI TAYLOR, Nurse Practitioner at ASPC-Lewis Rast Unit Corizon and others
Higdon #139953 v. Malachinski et al
as 2:2017cv02448
Plaintiff:
David Augustine Higdon
Defendant:
Leon Malachinski, Kyle Geelan, Tammi Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hatton et al
as 4:2017cv04030
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Shawn Hatton, V. Khan, Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017ct03173
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Griffin
Defendant:
Nadine J. Bryant, P.M. Mannion, A. Burgress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kernan et al
as 4:2017cv03538
Plaintiff:
James David Williams
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, S. Hatton, V. Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Patterson et al
as 3:2017cv03458
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Marrero
Defendant:
S. Patterson, Salazar, Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
