Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Merritte et al v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv09331
Plaintiff:
Calvin Merritte, Stanley Donahue, Darryl Gullens and others
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Salvador Godinez, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PHILPOT v. BEERS et al
as 3:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
WALTER PHILPOT
Defendant:
GAIL BEERS, J. MARSH, M. MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Berkebile, et al
as 13-1275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE, PATRICIA RANGEL, OFFICER ANDERSON and others
Pinson v. Berkebile, et al
as 13-1193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE, PATRICIA RANGEL, OFFICER KILMER and others
Amin v. Clements, et al
as 13-1043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDULLAH KRU AMIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director DOC, STEVE HARTLEY, Warden, A.V.C.F., WILLIAM MANUEL GOMEZ, A.V.C.F. Disciplinary Chairman and others
Umoja v. Todd et al
as 1:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Piru Umoja
Defendant:
K. Todd, G. Santiago and E. Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amin v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv02889
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Kru Amin
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Steve Hartley, William Manuel Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
