Cases 71 - 77 of 77
MILLER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv02686
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MALIK MILLER
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN K. MURRAY, MICHAEL A. LORENZO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MATTHEWS v. GUARINI et al
as 2:2007cv02099
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MATTHEWS
Defendant:
VINCE GUARINI, CHERYL STERBERGER and TAMMY MOYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FONTROY et al v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv01939
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I, THEODORE B. SAVAGE and AARON C. WHEELER
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS DOLMEN, JOHN MOYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PANNELL v. SHANNON et al
as 2:2007cv01944
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PANNELL
Defendant:
ROBERT SHANNON, DIGUGLIELMO, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY et al v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv00719
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY and SCOTT DRAKE
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, SYLVIA PALLOTT, MARY CANINO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wheeler, et al v. Shellenberger, et al
as 05-2969
Plaintiff:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER, THEODORE SAVAGE and JAMES STEPHEN PAVLICHKO, SR.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
JOHN O.J. SHELLENBERGER, III, EVERING, SAM ASH MUSIC SUPPLY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRATERFORD SCI, GRATERFORD SCI MEDICAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Wheeler, et al v. Shellenberger, et al
as 04-4696
Plaintiff:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER, THEODORE SAVAGE, JAMES STEPHEN PAVLICHKO, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN O.J. SHELLENBERGER, III, EVERING, SAM ASH MUSIC SUPPLY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRATERFORD SCI, GRATERFORD SCI MEDICAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Appellant:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
