Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, SIMONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLOSSON v. BALLARD et al
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCGLOSSON
Defendant:
J. BALLARD and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CLINKENBEARD v. FCI TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE, J BALLARD and COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GALLAGHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN NICHOLAS GALLAGHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DOMINICK, A. BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAFFETT v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GENE MAFFETT
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, RANDY STOKES, NURSING STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE, et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ALL MUNICIPALITY INCLUDED et al
as 2:2021cv00118
Defendant:
IN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ALL CORPORATIONS MAN PERSON'S ENTITY MARION COUNTY, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GENE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON v. INDIANA DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv02537
Defendant:
GIRDLER, JEREMY JONES, MONEBRAILE and others
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. TERRE HAUTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2020cv00130
Defendant:
LEE, GAGNOG, DON HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICK ALLEN BLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CILLA v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2019cv00262
Defendant:
KRUEGER, UNKNOWN OFFICER #2, BAEZ and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
