Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Ryan Charles Weaver
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Dr Rojas, Dr Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Breen-Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael L Evans
Defendant:
Dr Martha Breen-Smith, Hillary Berg, Dr Todd Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael S Johnson, Cesar Deleon, Glenn Kirvan and others
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Sarah Cooper, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirksey v. Koeller et al
as 2:2021cv01357
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Sgt Koeller, Dr Breen and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirksey v. Rozmarnoski et al
as 2:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Lt Rozmarnoski, CO Dorsey, Sgt Bambke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANABLE v. COBLE et al
as 1:2020cv00412
Defendant:
CONKRIN, PAUL A. TALBOT, WION and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER KANABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEYLEN v. BREEN et al
as 1:2019cv00801
Defendant:
I.I/I.A, M. BREEN, T. SOLOMON and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. BREEN et al
as 1:2019cv00641
Defendant:
AMBER KING, BRANDON RICHIE, JOSHUA SHAVERS and others
Plaintiff:
KALEFE MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
