Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Richmond County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Howard Junior Clark
Defendant:
Richmond County Police Dept., County of Richmond, Larry Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden v. Camacho et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Jesus Camacho, J. Steven Jones, W.C. Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smolen v. Fischer
as 13-4265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel J. Smolen, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Comm. Brian Fischer, Supt. Ada Perez, C.O. M. Miller and others
Smolen v. Fischer et al
as 1:2012cv01856
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Smolen, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Ada Perez, M. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. BARNES, et al
as 1:2009cv00559
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BROOKS, III
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, MONTGOMERY, C. WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BROOKS, III
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, MONTGOMERY, HAIRSTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THOMAS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY THOMAS
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, R. TINSLEY, D.S. ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROOKS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BROOKS, III
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, R. TINSLEY, D.S. ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv01825
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Parker
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, D.B. Watson, Keefe Commissary Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
