Cases 1 - 6 of 6
PERRY v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2021cv02753
Plaintiff:
RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
RYAN COCHRAN, Q. RUIZ, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Stone et al
as 2:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Odom
Defendant:
Unknown Stone, Unknown Hare, Unknown Ezell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jack Jones, Jr., et al v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jack Harold Jones, Jr.
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
Don William Davis, Alvin Bernal Jackson, Stacey Eugene Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction
Don Davis, et al v. Ray Hobb
as 10-1754
Plaintiff:
Jack Harold Jones, Jr.
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Don William Davis and Stacey Eugene Johnson
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Alvin Bernal Jackson, Kenneth Dewayne Williams, Jason Farrell McGehee and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ray Hobbs, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction
Terrick Nooner, et al v. Larry Norris, et al
as 08-2978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrick Terrell Nooner and Frank Williams, Jr.
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
Don William Davis and Jack Harold Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, in his official capacity as Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, in his official capacity as Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Cummins Unit, Wendy Kelly, in her official capacity as Deputy Director for Health and Correctional Programs, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Marsh v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Marsh
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Robert Butterworth, Liberty Behavioral Health Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
