Cases 1 - 10 of 866
Henderson v. Franklin et al
as 5:2024ct03128
Plaintiff:
David Henderson
Defendant:
Allison Franklin, Bryan Nelson, N. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bernard et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
Mr Terry Bernard and State of Georgia Pardons & Paroles Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
General Inmate Population of Chippewa Cree Tribal Adult Detention Center et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
General Inmate Population of Chippewa Cree Tribal Adult Detention Center, Tyrell Henderson, Tyson Eagleman and others
Defendant:
Annaleese Johnson, Dalelynn Henderson and Steve Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Henderson v. Jodie Perttu, et al
as 24-1760
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
JODIE PERTTU, ANGELO PANOS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE and others
Titus Henderson v. Rachel Matushak, et al
as 24-1761
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
RACHEL MATUSHAK, CASSANDRA BAIR, TONIA ROZMARYNOSKI and others
Titus Henderson v. Matthew Frank, et al
as 24-1756
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW FRANK, JONNI SHANNON-SHARPE, SARA MASON and others
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Titus Henderson v. Edward Wall, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
EDWARD WALL, GARY BOUGHTON, SARA MASON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
