Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Justice v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
James Jackson, Gary Edward Johnson, Jimmy Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Wood et al
as 2:2020cv02341
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Jay Willaman, Jesse Lewsader, City of Paris, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaefer v. Woods et al
as 2:2020cv02192
Defendant:
Ruth Bottom and Jeff Woods
Plaintiff:
Carl Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Favors v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 17-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager, Grievance Section, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Roden #222315 v. Hansen et al
as 2:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Sean Dedric Roden #222315
Defendant:
Robert Hansen, Jeff Woods, Michael LaCrosse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack Williams v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 16-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, C. HORTON, Deputy Warden, D. ISARD, Deputy Warden and others
Gene Favors v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 16-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager, Grievance Section, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
