Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ROGERS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv00335
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
LARRY GRANT JAMES ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Rogers
as 2:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
James Carl Burns
Defendant:
James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON V. STATE OF GEORGIA, ET AL.
as 7:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LAKEITH JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TIFT COUNTY GEORGIA, MELANIE CROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Hayes et al
as 3:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Ford
Defendant:
Christopher Hayes, David Alford, Nancy Heiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 15-1034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROGER DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, MILYARD, Warden and others
Duncan v. Ritter Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
James Roger Duncan
Defendant:
Bill Ritter Jr., John W. Hickenlooper , Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Oliver v. Robert Parkkila, et al
as 13-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE OLIVER, aka Ronnie Oliver-El
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PARKKILA, Corrections Officer - RUO, JAMES ROGERS, Corrections Officer, T. LINDEMUTH, RUM and others
Mangiaracina #303182 v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv00709
Plaintiff:
Nick Mangiaracina
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , Unknown Hansen, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Duncan v. Nordell et al
as 1:2011cv01600
Plaintiff:
James Roger Duncan
Defendant:
Keith Nordell, Teresa Reynold and Jennifer Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmill v. Sunnyslope Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Demond Whitmill
Defendant:
Sunnyslope Police Department, Unknown Party, James Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
