Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Adams v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
John Adams
Defendant:
Warden, Menard Correctional Center, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv05116
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, JEFFREY SMITH, CHRISTIAN LEINBACH and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Riles et al
as 2:2019cv02388
Defendant:
Barry Dority, Bobby Riles, Dr. Johnny E. Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 7:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
JOHN ADAM ROGERS
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MATTHEW BANNISTER, RANDY LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Hansen et al
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Salvador Godinez, Jesse Mortgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv01124
Plaintiff:
Donnie D. White
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Jesse Montgomery, Ty Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv07686
Plaintiff:
Donnie D. White
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Jesse Montgomery, Ty Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Adams et al
as 4:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Karlo L. Lane
Defendant:
John Adams and Robert Greeseree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Harris v. John Adams, et al
as 11-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ADAMS, Lieutenant, ROBERT TENUTA, Sergeant, CHARLES SCOTT, Nurse and others
Defendant:
FERNANDO FRONTERA, Doctor
Jaicourrie Finley v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 10-10893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAICOURRIE D. FINLEY, Lt Colonel
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, BRUCE ZELLER, Regional Staffer, JOHN ADAMS, Unit Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
