Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Giddens et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
T. Giddens, B. Cabell, M. Carta Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00318
Defendant:
B. Roberts, J. S. Edwards, Robert Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thompson et al
as 3:2016cv01504
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Stephen Thompson, T Tomlin, J. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAILE et al v. HOUGHSTEIN et al
as 4:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
J JAY SANDERS HAILE, VII and R JENKINS
Defendant:
J JONES, P J BONDI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hite v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv02575
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richard Hite
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUIZ v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FLOWERS, SHANER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLEEM v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2011cv00548
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DIMITRI SLEEM
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN PALMER, ARCHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapa v. Millard et al
as 2:2011cv00941
Plaintiff:
Ralph John Chapa
Defendant:
Gregory Millard, K S Reddy, Joseph M Arpaio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00641
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wayne Taylor
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, J. H. Kinney, V. Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
