Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Stateville Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv02157
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Stateville Correctional Center, Lt Semicivick and Officer Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DETENTION TACTICAL TEAM OFFICERS and OFFICER J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00889
Defendant:
SERGEANT TAYLOR, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL TACTICAL TEAM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00834
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
MR. SMITH, JOHN DOE, MR. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson, Cleve Billings, Ernest Moncada and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Governor of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Overall et al
as 3:2017cv00460
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Lillian Overall and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GEO GROUP INC, et al
as 5:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, G POYTHRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. GILLIS, et al
as 5:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
JAMAL CHE GLENN
Defendant:
SHAWN GILLIS and KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hart et al
as 1:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Hart, M. Khan, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Failey et al
as 3:2007cv01538
Plaintiff:
M Rodney E Jones
Defendant:
Ms Failey, SC Dept of Corr, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
