Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
TUCKER v. JONES
as 5:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, RICK SCOTT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haile et al v. U.S. Life Insurance Company, Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2017cv01084
Plaintiff:
John Sanders Haile, John Haile, Jr., L. W. Mackie and others
Defendant:
U.S. Life Insurance Company, Social Security Administration, J. Jones, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson
as 3:2014cv04958
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Thuddy, F. Kreitler, L. W. Rohlfing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. ROBERTS
as 4:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
DONALD PERRY
Defendant:
KAREN ROBERTS, KJ - JANE DOE, DAVID J ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer v. Walker et al
as 1:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Meyer
Defendant:
L. (I) W. Walker, L. W. Walker, Deborah (I) Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaka Farrakhan v. Gene Johnson
as 09-6991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKA AMIR FARRAKHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, J. JABE, Deputy Director, A. TEKLU, Medical Director and others
Bloodsaw v. Thom et al
as 5:2008cv04668
Plaintiff:
Theopric K. Bloodsaw
Defendant:
James C Thom, T. R. Holmes and L. W. Northrup
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
