Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McVeigh v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Renee McVeigh, Joni R. Diamond, Nellie Ruth Taylor and others
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole, Kay Ivey, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mink v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Lt. Metzger, Correctional Health Partners, Y. Chret and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Aaron Mink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Wall et al
as 2:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Robert L Collins
Defendant:
Edward F Wall , Dierdre Morgan, Cathy A Jess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Mink et al
as 6:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Donnie Hugh Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Mink and Laurel County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Hoem et al
as 2:2017cv00948
Plaintiff:
Eric D Conner
Defendant:
Stacy L Hoem , Scott Rubin-Asch, Angelia Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ards, Tyrone v. Saylor, Cody et al
as 3:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Ards
Defendant:
Cody Saylor , Mathew Scullion, Rebecca Engleburger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Litscher et al
as 2:2016cv01486
Plaintiff:
Treon D Vaughn
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Edward Wall, Heise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. CHC/Correctional Healthcare Solutions et al
as 1:2016cv02595
Plaintiff:
Warren D Watson
Defendant:
CHC/Correctional Healthcare Solutions, Mink, (I) Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Leffeler et al
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Boyd
Defendant:
Lt Leffeler , CO Gallinger, CO Wigel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
